When playing red rover, team members line up to form a chain to try and prevent someone from running through their joined hands Fig. The linked hands represent the hydrogen bonds between water molecules that can prevent an object from breaking through. Of course, a faster or heavier person can more easily break through the hand bonds during a game of red rover.
Where air and liquids meet there are unbalanced forces. Water molecules very near the surface are being pulled down and to the side by the strong cohesion of water to itself and the strong adhesion of water to the surface it is touching.
The result is a net force of attraction between water molecules a very flat, thin sheet of molecules at the surface see Fig. Because of hydrogen bonding, water can actually support objects that are more dense than it is. Water molecules stick to one another on the surface, which prevents the objects resting on the surface from sinking. It is also what allowed you to float a paper clip on water and the reason why a belly flop off the high dive into a pool of water is painful.
In Activity 2, you tried to stick two rulers together using a thin film of water between the rulers. Water acted like glue, and you were able to use one ruler to lift the other ruler using the adhesiveness of water see Fig.
This was a result of both water-water cohesion and water-ruler adhesion. In fact, because liquid water is so good at sticking to itself and to other substances, it can rise up a surface against the force of gravity! We call this climbing tendency of water capillarity also called capillary action. You saw capillarity in Activity 2 when you placed glass tubing in water.
Capillarity starts when the water molecules nearest the wall of the tube are attracted to the tube more strongly than to other water molecules. The water molecules nearest the glass wall of the tube rise up the side adhesion , dragging other water molecules with them cohesion. Water level in the tube rises until the downward force of gravity becomes equal to than the adhesion and cohesion of water. In a narrow tube, the molecules at the edges have fewer other water molecules to drag up the tube than in a large tube.
However complicated the negative ion, there will always be lone pairs that the hydrogen atoms from the water molecules can hydrogen bond to. An alcohol is an organic molecule containing an -OH group. Any molecule which has a hydrogen atom attached directly to an oxygen or a nitrogen is capable of hydrogen bonding.
Hydrogen bonds also occur when hydrogen is bonded to fluorine, but the HF group does not appear in other molecules. Molecules with hydrogen bonds will always have higher boiling points than similarly sized molecules which don't have an an -O-H or an -N-H group. The hydrogen bonding makes the molecules "stickier," such that more heat energy is required to separate them. This phenomenon can be used to analyze boiling point of different molecules, defined as the temperate at which a phase change from liquid to gas occurs.
They have the same number of electrons, and a similar length. The van der Waals attractions both dispersion forces and dipole-dipole attractions in each will be similar. However, ethanol has a hydrogen atom attached directly to an oxygen; here the oxygen still has two lone pairs like a water molecule.
Hydrogen bonding can occur between ethanol molecules, although not as effectively as in water. Except in some rather unusual cases, the hydrogen atom has to be attached directly to the very electronegative element for hydrogen bonding to occur. The boiling points of ethanol and methoxymethane show the dramatic effect that the hydrogen bonding has on the stickiness of the ethanol molecules:.
It is important to realize that hydrogen bonding exists in addition to van der Waals attractions. For example, all the following molecules contain the same number of electrons, and the first two have similar chain lengths. The higher boiling point of the butanol is due to the additional hydrogen bonding. Comparing the two alcohols containing -OH groups , both boiling points are high because of the additional hydrogen bonding; however, the values are not the same.
The boiling point of the 2-methylpropanol isn't as high as the butanol because the branching in the molecule makes the van der Waals attractions less effective than in the longer butanol.
Hydrogen bonding also occurs in organic molecules containing N-H groups; recall the hydrogen bonds that occur with ammonia. The two strands of the famous double helix in DNA are held together by hydrogen bonds between hydrogen atoms attached to nitrogen on one strand, and lone pairs on another nitrogen or an oxygen on the other one. In order for a hydrogen bond to occur there must be both a hydrogen donor and an acceptor present. The donor in a hydrogen bond is usually a strongly electronegative atom such as N, O, or F that is covalently bonded to a hydrogen bond.
The hydrogen acceptor is an electronegative atom of a neighboring molecule or ion that contains a lone pair that participates in the hydrogen bond. Since the hydrogen donor N, O, or F is strongly electronegative, it pulls the covalently bonded electron pair closer to its nucleus, and away from the hydrogen atom.
The hydrogen atom is then left with a partial positive charge, creating a dipole-dipole attraction between the hydrogen atom bonded to the donor and the lone electron pair of the acceptor.
This results in a hydrogen bond. Although hydrogen bonds are well-known as a type of IMF, these bonds can also occur within a single molecule, between two identical molecules, or between two dissimilar molecules. Intramolecular hydrogen bonds are those which occur within one single molecule. This occurs when two functional groups of a molecule can form hydrogen bonds with each other. In order for this to happen, both a hydrogen donor a hydrogen acceptor must be present within one molecule, and they must be within close proximity of each other in the molecule.
For example, intramolecular hydrogen bonding occurs in ethylene glycol C 2 H 4 OH 2 between its two hydroxyl groups due to the molecular geometry. ACS AuthorChoice. Article Views Altmetric -. Citations Abstract High Resolution Image.
Two decades subsequent to this despondent claim, hydrogen bonds were additionally complicated by proposals that short, strong, or low-barrier hydrogen bonds could be responsible for much of catalysis by enzymes, while also drawing new interest to these old interactions.
As is often the case, creative new ideas sparked discussion at multiple levels, comprising rounds of attacks, clarifications, and defenses.
Through this process, previously disconnected information is often integrated, initial proposals are shaped into more clearly defined models, and concrete tests are devised for these new models. Indeed, this has come to pass for hydrogen bonding, stimulated by the literature proposals and debates and building on data from decades of intensive research.
Here we describe the understanding that has emerged: a remarkably simple, highly predictive model for hydrogen bond structure that will be of great value to a broad swath of biochemists, chemists, and biologists. Unsurprisingly, there remain important challenges in energetics that can now be more clearly delineated.
Hydrogen bonds are interactions between the hydrogen atom covalently bound to an electronegative donor and the lone pair of electrons of an acceptor. Much of science entails searching for trends and trying to understand their origins. High Resolution Image. This relationship suggested a test for the generally held model that hydrogen bond lengths are intimately tied to the environment, i.
This presumed relationship was at the heart of proposals for hydrogen bond energetics, which posited the following. Therefore, 3 hydrogen bonds become stronger upon removal from water e.
Nevertheless, there was no evidence for or against the first postulate, and below we describe a test that disproves this presumed relationship between hydrogen bond length and environment. The common assumption that short hydrogen bonds are not formed in water and the difficulty in observing hydrogen bonds by 1 H NMR in water due to exchange likely discouraged a search for short hydrogen bonds in water. Observation of downfield 1 H chemical shifts would provide evidence of such hydrogen bonds in water and allow their lengths to be inferred Figure 2 A,B , although the absence of these peaks would not be definitive as it could reflect longer hydrogen bonds or rapid solvent exchange.
Sigala et al. Downfield chemical shifts were observed in water, indicative of short hydrogen bonds Figure 3 B , and the 1 H chemical shifts in water were essentially identical to those in the organic solvents Figure 3 C , as were effects from 2 H substitution on the chemical shifts, which provides information about the hydrogen bond potential.
However, 2-hydroxyphenylacetate, which has an additional rotatable bond relative to the salicylates and thus more flexibility and less geometric restriction, gave the same 1 H chemical shifts across solvents, just as the salicylates did Figure 3 D. The overall strong correlation remains, with an R 2 of 0. These hydrogen bonds follow a single correlation regardless of whether the proton is covalently attached to the nitrogen or oxygen, with R 2 values of 0. Table 1. We next turn to protein hydrogen bonds.
For example, in the active site of the enzyme ketosteroid isomerase KSI , a series of bound substituted phenolate ligands of varying p K a , which accept two hydrogen bonds from the KSI oxyanion hole hydrogen bond donors, gave slopes of 0.
Nevertheless, outliers exist for both protein and small molecule hydrogen bond distances, and there remains a significant scatter in the data that is well beyond the experimental error for the small molecule neutron diffraction structures. To conclude this section, we reiterate that there is no indication of general properties of the protein environment that alter hydrogen bonds. To assess whether this variation in length arises from factors beyond experimental uncertainty, we consider just the neutron diffraction data Figure 6 A,B.
The coefficients of determination of R 2 of 0. Inspection of the 3,5-dinitrosalicylate crystals revealed differences in hydrogen bonding patterns across the different crystals, suggesting that coupled hydrogen bonds could be responsible for much of the observed variation, and there is compelling evidence for such coupling from studies of hydrogen bond networks within proteins, as briefly described below.
To explore coupling effects, active site hydrogen bond networks containing oxyanion holes were perturbed for two variants of ketosteroid isomerase KSI and photoactive yellow protein PYP Figure 7 A , via a combination of site-directed mutagenesis and unnatural amino acid substitution at each position in the network.
First, the effects from perturbation of the hydrogen bond network diminished for more remote residues in the network, consistent with successive polarization effects see ref 50 and below. Second, there was an inverse relationship between hydrogen bond length for the two oxyanion hydrogen bond donors such that lengthening of one of the hydrogen bonds by a direct or proximal perturbation shortened the other.
This common relationship suggests a limited influence of the surroundings on hydrogen bond couplings. We know that steric factors can alter hydrogen bonding. We also know that other interactions can aid hydrogen bond formation, for example, if active site hydrophobic interactions with a ligand help position it to favor protein—ligand hydrogen bond formation, i.
Here we address the subtler question of whether a protein—ligand hydrogen bond can be altered from its preferred length and geometry by protein structural features, by noting small molecule and protein examples with such effects.
A second example involves substituted phenolates within the KSI oxyanion hole, which donate short hydrogen bonds to para- and meta- substituted phenolates. As we know that proteins are dynamic on this length scale and greater length scales, 55 the inability to relax may arise from protein dynamics that are highly anisotropic, coupled, and idiosyncratic, a perspective that is also supported by recent room-temperature X-ray crystallographic results for this system F.
Yabukarski, J. Biel, M. Pinney, T. Doukov, J. Fraser, and D. Herschlag, manuscript in preparation. What factors in addition to those addressed above might affect hydrogen bond structure? Metal ions in interaction networks would be expected to alter hydrogen bonds, presumably with larger perturbations than from hydrogen bond networks due to their higher charge densities and thus stronger polarizing effects, and there is evidence for such effects see footnote d.
Remote electrostatic fields in proteins could also, in principle, alter hydrogen bond lengths. This model might be tested via prediction of field effects on hydrogen bond lengths followed by experimental length determinations. We often, for the sake of convenience, refer to models as facts. We suggest that analogous comparisons to predicted hydrogen bond length ranges might become standard, minimally for very high resolution structures. Upon closer inspection, the experimental electron density suggested multiple conformational states that were fit to a single conformation model J.
Fraser, personal communication. Given the often-limited sampling that is possible and the assumptions that underlie these models, assessing the structures that arise and are subsequently used to reach mechanistic and energetic conclusions would help in the evaluation of models and could identify molecular features that may cause distortions in hydrogen bonds, which could then be tested experimentally.
Once hydrogen bond length outliers arising from experimental uncertainty and errors are eliminated and adjustments are made for hydrogen bond networks and coordination to metal ions, we may be left with an interesting set of experimental outliers that may help us better understand the protein interior.
Given that hydrogen bond length changes going from ground to transition states are typically on a sub-angstrom scale, such knowledge may help us better understand enzyme catalysis and better evaluate catalytic models. The simplest models for hydrogen bonds are purely electrostatic, with point charges assigned to the donor and acceptor heteroatoms and the central hydrogen atom.
For example, the vast majority of hydrogen bonds are shorter than the sum of van der Waals radii of the hydrogen bonding heavy atoms Figure 5. Indeed, even quantum mechanics Hartree—Fock calculations, which do not take into account electron—electron correlations, overestimate hydrogen bond lengths.
The simplification of a transferable energy also does not hold for hydrogen bonds. The situation becomes even more complex when we compare two equilibria or kinetic processes Figure 11 , top vs bottom , and many biochemical experiments involve such comparisons. For example, enzyme catalysis is assessed relative to a corresponding solution reaction, folding or catalysis of a wild-type enzyme is dissected by comparison to mutant proteins where specific residues of interest are altered see also footnote h , enzyme specificity is assessed by comparing reactions with different substrates, and catalyses by enzymes from different organisms are compared to better understand selective pressures and environmental niches.
In each case, there are at least four states, and changes to any and all states must be considered to understand the physical origins of the energetic effect. In the face of these pervasive complexities, one simplification arises from the experimental observations and QM calculations outlined in the prior section. As the geometry and potential energy surface of the hydrogen-bonded complex are nearly constant across different solvents and environments, the primary features affecting free energies of hydrogen bond formation are expected to be differential interactions of the solvent or surroundings between the free and hydrogen-bound states.
Pinney and F. Yabukarski, manuscript in preparation. Figure 12 presents a thermodynamic framework to aid in considering the environmental factors that affect hydrogen bond equilibria and hydrogen bond energetics. As the factors involved in overall catalysis and energetics are varied and complex, we simplified this scheme.
Thermodynamic cycles, such as those in Figure 12 , are powerful tools to build and test intuition and should stimulate further discussion but should not be mistaken as an attempt at an accurate representation.
Figure 12 allows us to analyze this common model and illustrates that there is not a de facto increase in the level of catalysis from the removal of hydrogen bonds from aqueous solution.
But how does this relate to enzymatic catalysis? The free energies of hydrogen bond formation e. We therefore must use the vertical dimension to assess the catalytic effects expected from simple removal of a hydrogen bond from water and placement in a nonpolar environment. The hydrogen-bonded states on the right side of Figure 12 represent analogous ground states top and transition states bottom for reaction in aqueous front and nonpolar back environments. Thus, charge localization in an oxyanionic transition state is disfavored more in the nonpolar environment than in water.
Indeed, such a transition alone would hinder rather than promote reaction, so there must be additional compensating factors that enzymes use to achieve catalysis. Thus, creating a nonpolar environment does not stabilize the charge-dense, hydrogen-bonded transition state, relative to that same transition state in water.
As noted above, other factors are needed for catalysis. The properties of this environment can alter hydrogen bond energetics and also provide multiple additional catalytic features. These additional features include side chains that act as nucleophiles and general acids and bases, cofactors that license particular types of chemical transformations, binding interactions that position substrates with respect to one another and with respect to catalytic groups, and the overarching protein scaffold that is responsible for positioning of all of the groups noted above.
Another fundamental difference between the protein environment and a nonpolar solvent is that proteins have many dipoles: each peptide bond, many of the side chains, and nearby water molecules. On the other hand, if enough nearby enzyme charges and dipoles were sufficiently immobile and sufficiently oriented to stabilize the transition state and if solvating water molecules were sufficiently remote, then there may be substantial electrostatic advantages to catalysis from these groups.
Most generally, these and other models accounting for enzymatic catalysis require explicit and specific predictions, preferably quantitative, that allow the models to be tested and distinguished. While we can now readily make a discrete list of catalytic features, they are inextricably linked, and as a consequence, enzyme energetics are highly nonadditive.
It is now common to computationally reproduce rate effects from previous experiments, but given the large number of interactions present—and thus potential variables in a computational model—simply matching one or a few overall rate effects is unlikely to adequately distinguish between models that assign different weights to interactions and catalytic features.
Indeed, it is not uncommon for different computational models to reproduce prior kinetic results, despite having different underlying mechanisms. In the face of these difficulties and complexities, we need to develop clearly defined models that deliver nontrivial predictions that are different for different models and that are made prior to experiment, so that experiments can be used to test, distinguish, and refine these models.
We close by codifying our current state of understanding into five rules for hydrogen bonds that may aid in future hydrogen bond discussions and may provide a foundation for teaching students of biochemistry about these vital interactions. These rules may help researchers consider structure—function relationships across the enormous variety of biological systems in which hydrogen bonds play important roles.
The development and testing of models for hydrogen bonds described herein and summarized by these rules may also inform the development of predictive models for the more complicated problem of overall enzymatic catalysis and ensuring that these models are testable and distinguishable.
This is the powerful simplification outlined herein that allows us to consider a given hydrogen bond species, like a covalent species, as impervious to environment, to a first approximation. This rule holds nearly universally Figures 4 and 5.
Deviations from this behavior allow the identification of model error or interesting system features, such as hydrogen bond coupling, limiting steric interactions, and competing structural preferences. These environments lack competing hydrogen bond donors and acceptors and are far worse than water at solvating separated hydrogen bonding partners, leading to a large driving force for hydrogen bond formation.
The free energy of transfer of a charged or highly dipolar hydrogen-bonded complex from water to a nonpolar solvent is unfavorable. By this simple measure, hydrogen bonds or hydrogen-bonded complexes are, in general, more stable in water.
This observation is the basis for one model for how enzymes may take advantage of hydrogen bond behaviors to facilitate catalysis e. Supporting Information. Author Information. Margaux M. The authors declare no competing financial interest. Google Scholar There is no corresponding record for this reference. Science , — , DOI: Spectroscopic properties of chymotrypsin and model compds. These conclusions are supported by the chem.
Science , , DOI: Science Washington, D. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Current Biology. A review and discussion with 63 refs. The authors discuss and defend this proposal and provide evidence for likely changes of H-bond strengths during enzymic catalysis.
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. A review with refs. The authors explain the original proposal, summarize exptl. Theory versus experiment. Ash, Elissa L. Cleland and Kreevoy recently advanced the idea that a special type of hydrogen bond H-bond , termed a low-barrier hydrogen bond LBHB , may account for the "missing" transition state stabilization underlying the catalytic power of many enzymes, and Frey et al.
The inconsistencies between theory and expt. A review, with 57 refs. It has been proposed that some remarkable enzymic catalytic effects can be explained by the existence of unusually strong hydrogen bonds within the enzyme's active site. Although such hydrogen bonds may be short, and may have unusual properties, there is no evidence that unusually strong hydrogen bonds exist in soln. Thus there is no basis for invoking strong hydrogen bonds to explain enzymic rate enhancements.
American Chemical Society. A review. In a sym. The energy diagram for hydrogen motion is thus a single-well potential, rather than the double-well potential of a more typical H-bond, in which the hydrogen is covalently bonded to one atom and H-bonded to the other. Examples of sym. H-bonds are often found in crystal structures, and they exhibit the distinctive feature of unusually short length: for example, the O-O distance in sym.
OHO H-bonds is found to be less than 2. In comparison, the O-O distance in a typical asym. In this Account, we briefly review and update our use of the method of isotopic perturbation to search for a sym. This presumptive bond strength has been invoked to explain some enzyme-catalyzed reactions. Yet in soln. In fact, all of the purported examples of strong, sym. H-bonds have been found to exist in soln.
The asymmetry can be attributed to the disorder of the local solvation environment, which leads to an equil. If the disorder of the local environment is sufficient to break symmetry, then symmetry itself is not sufficient to stabilize the H-bond, and sym. H-bonds do not have an enhanced stability or an unusual strength. Nor are short H-bonds unusually strong. We discuss previous evidence for "short, strong, low-barrier" H-bonds and show it to be based on ambiguous comparisons.
Proteins: Struct. A review, with 28 refs. The authors report here role of hydrogen bonds in the enzyme catalysis.
Science , 97 — , DOI: Low-barrier or short, strong hydrogen bonds have been proposed to contribute 10 to 20 kcal per mol to transition-state stabilization in enzymic catalysis. The proposal invokes a large increase in hydrogen bond energy when the pKa values of the donor and acceptor where Ka is the acid const.
This hypothesis was tested by investigating the energetics of hydrogen bonds as function of pK for homologous series of compds. However, no addnl. These results and those of other model studies suggest alternative mechanisms by which hydrogen bonds can contribute to enzymic catalysis, in accord with conventional electrostatic considerations. Science New York, N. PLoS Med. There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false. The probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and, importantly, the ratio of true to no relationships among the relationships probed in each scientific field.
In this framework, a research finding is less likely to be true when the studies conducted in a field are smaller; when effect sizes are smaller; when there is a greater number and lesser preselection of tested relationships; where there is greater flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes; when there is greater financial and other interest and prejudice; and when more teams are involved in a scientific field in chase of statistical significance.
Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias. In this essay, I discuss the implications of these problems for the conduct and interpretation of research. A review with 35 refs. The NMR method of isotopic perturbation can distinguish between single- and double-well potentials in intramol.
These are classic cases of a "strong", sym. The obsd. The change is attributed to the disorder of the aq. These are simple counterexamples to the hope that the crystal structure reveals the actual mol.
A review and discussion with 36 refs. Formation of a short less than 2. Formation of such a bond can supply 10 to 20 kcal per mol and thus facilitate difficult reactions such as enolization of carboxylate groups. Because low-barrier hydrogen bonds form only when the pKa's neg. Several examples of enzymic reactions that appear to use this principle are presented.
Biochemistry 34 , — , DOI: Schwartz, Benjamin; Drueckhammer, Dale G. The ternary complexes of these inhibitors with oxaloacetate and citrate synthase have been crystd.
The structures are similar to those reported for the corresponding non-fluorinated analogs Usher et al. The binding affinities are consistent with increased strengths of hydrogen bonds to Asp with closer matching of pKa values between hydrogen bond donors and acceptors. The results do not support any direct correlation between hydrogen bond strength and hydrogen bond length in enzyme-inhibitor complexes. A , — , DOI: The main source of the difference is the relatively larger decrease in the intermol.
The decrease is interpreted semiquant. The shortening of the OO distance and the lengthening of the donating O-H bond are both shown to occur as a result of the stronger attraction. Implications for other short strong hydrogen bonds are discussed. The p K a slide rule: toward the solution of a long-lasting problem. Unlike normal chem. Instead, their chem. This surprising behavior, sometimes called the H-bond puzzle, practically prevents prediction of H-bond strengths from the properties of the interacting mols.
Explaining this puzzle has been the main research interest of our lab. The RAHB discovery prompted new studies on strong H-bonds, finally leading to a general H-bond classification in six classes, called the six chem. These studies attested to the covalent nature of the strong H-bond showing, by a formal valence-bond treatment, that weak H-bonds are basically electrostatic while stronger ones are mixts.
At this limit, the strong and sym. In this Account, this hypothesis is reconsidered by using a new instrument, the pKaslide rule, a bar chart that reports in sep. Allowing the two scales to shift so to bring selected donor and acceptor mols. In the liquid state, the hydrogen bonds of water can break and reform as the molecules flow from one place to another. When water is cooled, the molecules begin to slow down.
Eventually, when water is frozen to ice, the hydrogen bonds become permanent and form a very specific network. Figure 3. When water freezes to ice, the hydrogen bonding network becomes permanent.
Each oxygen atom has an approximately tetrahedral geometry — two covalent bonds and two hydrogen bonds. The bent shape of the molecules leads to gaps in the hydrogen bonding network of ice.
Ice has the very unusual property that its solid state is less dense than its liquid state. Ice floats in liquid water. Virtually all other substances are denser in the solid state than in the liquid state. Hydrogen bonds play a very important biological role in the physical structures of proteins and nucleic acids.
0コメント