For before certain men came from James, he used to eat with the Gentiles. But when they arrived, he began to draw back and separate himself from the Gentiles because he was afraid of those who belonged to the circumcision group. The other Jews joined him in his hypocrisy, so that by their hypocrisy even Barnabas was led astray. Paul goes on to explain how he lectured Peter in front of the others.
This passage is often used to illustrate that even Peter was clearly capable of making poor decisions, and received correction from other apostles. Both of them claim to have been written by him 1 Peter , 2 Peter Tradition has held that Peter is the author of these books.
While 1 Peter claims to be written by Peter, its style and language suggest the author had a formal Greek education. Acts 4 specifically tells us that Peter had no such education, which made his boldness as a teacher all the more impressive:.
In the closing remarks, the author clearly indicates that a man named Silas helped write the letter:. In 2 Peter 1, the author clearly refers to his impending death, which would fit with Peter:. However, early Christian writers and modern scholars alike have had a harder time believing Peter wrote or dictated 2 Peter. In the fourth century, church historian Eusebius wrote:.
Of the Disputed Books which are nevertheless known to most are the Epistle called of James, that of Jude, the second Epistle of Peter, and the so-called second and third Epistles of John which may be the work of the evangelist or of some other with the same name.
Why would anyone doubt that Peter wrote it? For starters, the style and word choice is different from 1 Peter. But more importantly, some folks believe the letter had to have been written after Peter died , for a few reasons :.
However, the teachings in 2 Peter have been valued by the church for as long as the letter has been around. And when the Catholic and Protestant churches finally made their canons official, they both considered 2 Peter valuable enough to make the grade.
The first we hear about John Mark is in Acts This is the only explicit mention of John Mark and Peter being together, and John Mark is only mentioned a few more times, always as a companion of Paul and Barnabas. And he causes some drama between them. No other author was ever proposed. Irenaeus, Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, and Jerome all support the traditional origins of this gospel. The Gospel of Peter is believed to have been written in the second century, perhaps based on oral tradition, or possibly based loosely on the Synoptic Gospels.
It claims to have been written by Peter, but most early church fathers and modern scholars reject this authorship. The Acts of Peter was the first text to claim that Peter was crucified upside down. The Acts of Peter and Andrew is basically just a series of miracles supposedly performed by Peter and Andrew. In one of them, Peter literally puts a camel through the eye of a needle.
The book claims to have been written by a man named Marcellus, a disciple of Simon Magus. Since Simon Magus lived in the first century, and this book appeared in the late fifth century, this is clearly pseudepigraphal. The first half of the book is a parable of a merchant who later reveals himself to be Jesus who is selling a pearl. The second half is a gnostic explanation of what it means.
Fun fact: Many ancient gnostic texts falsely claimed to have been written by apostles or famous biblical figures to lend credibility to their theology.
Written around the second or third century, this text offered a gnostic perspective on the crucifixion and criticized the traditional Christian understanding. This pseudepigraphal letter was found in the Nag Hammadi library, and is believed to be from the second or third century.
The letter claims to be written by Peter, and describes a post-resurrection appearance of Jesus, during which Jesus blends gnostic and orthodox teachings. The Apocalypse of Peter, also known as the Revelation of Peter, is a first-century text that was lost until The text itself recounts visions of heaven and hell which Jesus gave to Peter. It describes the specific pleasures and punishments people will receive for their virtues and their sins.
In addition to the apocryphal works that claim to be written by Peter and those that focus on him, there are also several gnostic gospels that supposedly quote Peter, including the Gospel of Thomas and the Gospel of Mary.
Another book was opened, which is the book of life. So there you have it. Peter really only has two names. Simon and Peter. But the multiple languages which the Bible is written in, causes a bit of confusion. Photo source: here. Clement of Alexandria referred to a separate disciple of Jesus named Cephas. But this is almost certainly not the case. Simon Peter. Simon bar-Jonah. Palestinean mission, a. He received a call to Caesarea, and in the house of Cornelius opened the door of privilege to the Gentiles.
Syrian mission with Antioch as a center, a. Rome, 61 a. Legend has it that Peter deemed himself unworthy to die in exactly the same way as his Lord had, and so begged his crucifiers to crucify him upside down. The best value in digital Bible study. Log in. The Bible. Bible Statistics and History. New Testament. Study now. See Answer. Best Answer.
Only one - Simon Peter, apostle of Jesus. Study guides. Old Testament 20 cards. A very important value of the Bible is that it. The Bible came primarily from. The Old Testament included the book of. What is known of the actual words of Jesus. New Testament 20 cards. The Protestant Reformation attempted to relate the bible to the. Jealousy and anger shorten life comes from. Slavery 21 cards. What did the north think about states' rights.
How did the Union Army gain control of the Mississippi River. Which political party opposed the spread of slavery. Q: How many Peters are named in the Bible? Write your answer Related questions.
0コメント